According to a 2009 Global Insight study, venture-backed companies accounted for 12.1 million jobs and $2.9 trillion in revenue in the U.S. in 2008. In the last 30 years, the US venture capital industry has established itself as bedrock of innovation-led growth of the US economy, and a model of success that other countries around the world have sought to emulate.
In recent years, however, phlegmatic returns have given rise to the criticism that the US venture model is bloated, or at worst, broken. I came across a recent paper published by veteran industry researchers – Professors Steven Kaplan of University of Chicago and Josh Lerner of Harvard University – that counters that notion. They contend that the industry may be strongly positioned for the years ahead. Some interesting findings are –
a) Historically, the industry returns have been strong when LP commitments have declined. This suggests that 2009-2010 vintage year funds should perform well.
b) Major corporations are reducing their central R&D facilities and are instead relying on acquiring technology through purchase of small entrepreneurial companies. This is a positive long-term trend for the venture capital backed companies.
In recent years, however, phlegmatic returns have given rise to the criticism that the US venture model is bloated, or at worst, broken. I came across a recent paper published by veteran industry researchers – Professors Steven Kaplan of University of Chicago and Josh Lerner of Harvard University – that counters that notion. They contend that the industry may be strongly positioned for the years ahead. Some interesting findings are –
a) Historically, the industry returns have been strong when LP commitments have declined. This suggests that 2009-2010 vintage year funds should perform well.
b) Major corporations are reducing their central R&D facilities and are instead relying on acquiring technology through purchase of small entrepreneurial companies. This is a positive long-term trend for the venture capital backed companies.